CHSUG 1001 Introduction to Community & Human Services Assessment Two: Essay

Weighting: 40% of your overall grade for this course
Due date: Sunday 14th June at 11:55pm
Word count: 2000 words (+/- 10%)
Submit: Submit your assignment in Word or PDF format through the Turnitin link on Moodle
Write an essay on the following topic:
Analyse the impact of neoliberalism on the community and human services in Australia. Focus your response on one field of practice.
You are required to write an academic essay on the topic listed above. Your essay should follow an essay structure and should flow in a clear and logical manner. You should write the essay in your own words and ensure that you acknowledge any direct quotations appropriately.
You need to support your response with appropriate evidence from academic sources (minimum of 8) and ensure that you reference these sources appropriately in APA format.
You should ensure that you meet the word length limit and proofread your work carefully. You should also ensure that you follow the Fed Uni Guide to Lay-out and Appearance to format and present your essay.
You will receive feedback from your LREP to assist you in completing your essay.
Note: Fields of practice could include mental health, child protection, disability services, refugee settlement services, aged care, etc. You are free to choose any field of practice within the community and human services. Check your course materials and reading from week 2 to assist you in choosing a field of practice.
You will be marked following the marking guide below.
MARKING GUIDE – ESSAY
Criteria Marks
Addressing the essay topic, 8 marks
This relates to your ability to address all aspects of the essay topic, the level of detail of your essay, and the clarity of your contention.

Addresses all parts of the essay topic clearly and comprehensively
6.5 – 8
Addresses all parts of the essay topic clearly and with a good level of detail
5.5 – 6
Addresses all parts of the essay topic but could have improved clarity and detail
4.5 – 5
Addresses most parts of the essay question but needs a clearer contention and/or greater detail
4.0
Does not satisfactorily address the essay question
0 – 3.5
Understanding of topic, 8 marks
This relates to how well you show your understanding of the course materials related to the essay topic and apply this to your chosen field of practice

Shows comprehensive knowledge of the topic and exemplary ability to apply this to the chosen field
6.5 – 8
Shows strong knowledge of the topic and very good ability to apply this to the chosen field
5.5 – 6
Shows good knowledge of the topic and uses some examples from the chosen field
4.5 – 5
Shows some knowledge of the topic but needs to improve level of detail and/or application to a field
4.0
Does not show satisfactory knowledge of the essay topic
0 – 3.5
Depth of analysis, 8 marks
This relates to the depth of your analysis, including your ability to consider multiple perspectives and make connections

Deeply analyses the topic by integrating multiple perspectives and forming connections between ideas
6.5 – 8
Shows a good level of depth in analysis by considering multiple perspectives
5.5 – 6
Shows a satisfactory level of depth in analysis – could include a broader range of perspectives
4.5 – 5
Describes/explains the topic without adequate analysis – needs to consider multiple perspectives
4.0
Does not show satisfactory depth
0 – 3.5
Strength of justification, 8 marks
This relates to your ability to justify your analysis, including your use of appropriate supporting evidence

Shows comprehensive justification and extensive use of high-quality academic evidence
6.5 – 8
Shows very good justification and uses high-quality academic supporting evidence
5.5 – 6
Shows good justification and makes use of academic evidence – but could improve quality/quantity
4.5 – 5
Shows satisfactory justification and limited use of academic evidence (6-8 sources)
4.0
Does not show satisfactory justification and does not use sufficient academic evidence (<6 sources) 0 – 3.5 Essay structure, 2 marks This relates to your ability to structure your essay appropriately (including introduction, conclusion, clear flow of paragraphs & use of topic sentences) Excellent essay structure and flow 1.75 – 2 Very good essay structure. Minor improvements needed to improve flow 1.5 Good essay structure including an intro, conclusion and paragraphs. Work on flow & topic sentences 1.25 Satisfactory essay structure. Introduction, conclusion and/or paragraphs need greater clarity and flow 1.0 Structure of essay was not satisfactory. Introduction, conclusion and/or clear paragraphs not included 0 – 0.75 Written expression, 2 marks This relates to your ability to write in your own words (paraphrase) in academic language with excellent spelling and grammar. Excellent academic written expression in students own words 1.75 – 2 Very good written expression in students own words. Minor spelling/grammatical errors 1.5 Good written expression. Mostly written in students own words. Some spelling/grammatical errors 1.25 Satisfactory written expression. Academic language, paraphrasing and spelling/grammar need work 1.0 Written expression is not satisfactory 0 – 0.75 Referencing, 2 marks This relates to your ability to correctly use APA format for your in-text citations and reference list Reference list and in-text citations are all correct for all sources 1.75 – 2 Reference list and in-text citations are all correct for most sources 1.5 Reference list and in-text citations are mostly correct for most sources 1.25 Reference list and in-text citations are included for all sources but contain many errors 1.0 Reference list and in-text citations are not included or are not correct 0 – 0.75 Presentation, 2 marks This relates to your ability to correctly present your assignment through use of appropriate font, lay-out, spacing, and cover sheet – as outlined in the Fed Uni Guide to Lay-out and Appearance. Excellent presentation of essay 1.75 – 2 Very good presentation of essay. Minor errors in use of font, spacing or lay-out 1.5 Good presentation. Make adjustments to font, spacing, and/or lay-out as per Fed Uni guide 1.25 Satisfactory presentation. Use appropriate and consistent font, spacing, and lay-out as per Fed Uni guide 1.0 Presentation of essay is not satisfactory. Presentation makes essay difficult to read and comprehend. 0 – 0.75 TOTAL MARKS /40 1. What do you think of the dominance of the Roman Church in the Middle Ages? Any positive and/or negative impacts? 2. Some argued that in a modern society where science has been made popular and the vast of public are well educated, it is meaningless even ridiculous to hold any religious belief. What do you think about such view? 3. The Catholic criticised the Protestants that their protestation1,ruined a once uniform kingdom by creating thousands of scattered kingdoms,2,ruined a wholehearted belief of God among nations by tearing it into pieces ofdifferent versions of belief,3,ruined the single dominance of Popeship by establishing thousands of tyranniesby local monarchies, and4,was more intolerant to their own fellow protestants than what the Roman Popedid in the past centuries.What do you think of such criticism of Protestants? 4. Which aspect(s) of the Enlightenment movement impress you most? Why? 5.What do you think of the slogan of ‘universal human happiness as the highest goal’? What are its positive and negative impacts? 6.Do you think the core values upheld by the Enlightenment movement in conflict with the Christian belief? • It’s an exam with just 5 questions.1.How did the event at the Lotus Eaters’ Island relate to the average Greek’s life? (What was the meaning for the listener?)2. What does the episode of Calypso reveal about the life of Greek men during this time3.How did Penelope keep the suitors at bay for so long? 4. What was Penelope’s final trick to see if Odysseus was really her husband? Based on two articles from 2003 or later, select two contemporary change leadership models. Compare them. Explain why they would be appropriate for today and chaotic, fast-paced global environment. In 200- 250 words with 3 references. • Leadership What are three leadership styles? Compare and contrast the three. When would it be advisable to display democracy when working in small groups? When would it be necessary to be an autocratic leader? Name a situation and explain what can happen if someone in authority cannot be flexible should a need arise? write the answer in an essay with 2 PAGES MLA style NO plagiarism 5) How are your two philosophers coming along? Take time to finalize your search for the two and write your faculty member a paragraph in which you announce their names and the one area of political thought for comparison. In a sentence or two, explain what draws you to this focus. ********DO NOT TALK ABOUT Aristotle/Socriates******** **********DO NOT WRITE ABOUT Augustine.Arias******* APA format, with intext citation 6) Please answer the following Critical Review Questions from Chapter Nine. Chapter Nine – 1. A strong emotional attachment and loyalty to a charismatic leader can have both beneficial and detrimental effects on followers. Explain both types of effective followers. 2. Explain the importance of effective communications skills for charismatic and transformational leaders. 3. Servant leadership emphasizes being able to serve and lead. In your opinion, is this contradictory or doable. Explain! 4. Do you believe everyone has the same capability to become a servant leader, or are some people by their nature more inclined to be a servant leaders? Explain! 5. Describe a charismatic or transformational leader you have known. Your submission should be a minimum of two full pages of analysis. Please use this reference; Lussier, R. & Achua, C. (2015). Leadership: Theory, Application, & Skill development. New York, NY: Cengage Learning. 7) In what ways do you think this treatment approach will affect terminations? Describe at least two other factors that influence a client's termination experience, and also two factors that influence a counselor's experience of a client's termination. Post should be at least 300 words. 8) Resource: Review “The Principle of Selection,” Ch. 7 of Oxford History of Art: Twentieth-Century American Art, and the Week Four Electronic Reserve Readings Write a 200- to 350-word summary responding to the following: • What did both Warhol and Rauschenberg have in common in regards to their art work? • How were their subjects a reflection of the era in which they were created? • What list of found objects and imagery would you use if you were creating an art work about your daily experience?